In February, Dr. Dan McGehee had come to talk about his work on nicotine induced changes on synaptic strength. He specifically focused on the receptor systems that are involved with nicotine, as well as the long term changes that occur because of nicotine in excitatory synaptic input to ventral segmental area dopamine neurons. McGehee
discussed that nicotine activates nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChR)
which then carries on to cause long term potentiation in ventral tegmental area
dopamine neurons. This then causes an increase of glutamate through alpha-7
nAChRs on glutamate terminals. Therefore, there is a presynaptic contribution
of nicotine in long term potentiation induction. In his study, McGehee and his
colleagues had utilized an in vitro exposure paradigm in order to study the
effects of nicotine on excitatory synaptic strength in “drug naïve rats” (Mao
et al., 2011). This rose the AMPA receptor/NMDAR ratio in ventral tegmental
area dopamine neurons, which gave reason to believe there was an induction of
long term potentiation caused by the nicotine. They also found that there was
an induction of synaptic plasticity which they thought was most likely due to
the increased activity of NMDAR. As a result of their research, McGehee and his
colleagues had identified receptor systems that have to do with long term
changes that are caused by nicotine in excitatory synaptic input to ventral
tegmental area dopamine neurons. By identifying these common receptors,
addiction to nicotine as well as cigarettes can be better understood.
In a recent New
York Times article by Sabrina Tavernise called, “Smokers Urged to Switch to
E-Cigarettes by British Medical Group”, the argument of whether e-cigarettes
are better than traditional cigarettes for the public health is brought to
light. A British medical organization had come up with a report stating that
the benefits of e-cigarettes are greater than the cost and that they can help
people who smoke to quit. E-cigarettes deliver nicotine to the user, but do
this without the use of tar or other chemicals that are found in traditional
cigarettes and are what leads to cancer. According to to the director of the
U.K. Center for Tabacco and Alcohol Studies at the University of Nottingham,
John Britton, e-cigarettes “have the potential to help half or more of all
smokers get off cigarettes. That’s a huge benefit, bigger than just about any
medical intervention.” However, many experts in the U.S. strongly disagree with
this.
According to a
professor of medicine at the University of California, “They are turning
England into this giant experiment on behalf of the tobacco industry.” Many
experts in the U.S. have mentioned many potential dangers of e-cigarettes, such
as the fact that they could extend smoking habits, they may be a gateway for
traditional cigarettes for children, as well as the fact that since
e-cigarettes are a fairly new and fast growing phenomenon, the long term
effects of them are unknown. However, there are some in the U.S. who do agree
with British experts in that they want policies that will reduce harm to
people, not eliminate, such as e-cigarettes rather than traditional, and clean
needles for drug use because people are not going to just stop smoking
cigarettes or doing drugs and so we should make sure they are doing it in a safer
manner. There are some U.S. experts who also say that information that benefits
the argument for e-cigarettes has been lost in the midst of the rush to condemn
them.
U.K. officials
claim that e-cigarettes can increase the ability to quit smoking by 50% and
that “long term effects [are] likely to be minimal”, where as U.S. officials
claim that they will reduce the chances in quitting. McGehee’s work also
contradicts the arguments of British experts in that nicotine does have a long
term effect on the body. His work found that nicotine is involved in inducing
long term changes in the excitatory synaptic input to ventral tegmental area
dopamine neurons. Perhaps a good question to ask is what kinds of effects could
this have on the body.
Tavernise
mentions in the article that it seems as though the U.K. is focusing more on
the hypothetical benefits of e-cigarettes and the U.S. is focusing on the
hypothetical risks. The work of McGehee pointed towards identifying more
effective treatments for nicotine addiction as well as other psychostimulant
addictions. The use of e-cigarettes has grown so fast that the FDA is far
behind on regulation on them, hopefully more work like that of McGehee will be
done in order to find out if e-cigarettes truly do help with the quitting
process and if there are any detrimental long-term effects.
References
Mao, D., Gallagher, K., McGehee, D. “Nicotine
Potentiation of Excitatory Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Dopamine Neurons.” The Journal of Neuroscience 31. 18
(2011): 6710-6720. Print.
Tavernise, Sabrina.
"Smokers Urged to Switch to E-Cigarettes by British Medical Group." The
New York Times. The New York Times, 27 Apr. 2016. Web. 01 May 2016. <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/health/e-cigarettes-vaping-quitting-smoking-royal-college-of-physicians.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=search&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront>
Picture: http://newsroom.cumc.columbia.edu/blog/2013/11/21/e-cigarettes-healthy-alternative-smoking/
The laws here can be difficult to understand if you are not a lawyer. However, they can be broken down to basic terms to make them easier to digress. The laws ensure that "seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes. chief carts
ReplyDelete