Novel
CNS Protection Strategies Compared to Disease Modifying Treatments in Multiple
Sclerosis:
Kevin Kaschke
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune modulate death of oligodendrocytes leading to demyelination and eventually axonal death. The hallmark of the disease is inflammation and accumulation of myelin debris. Currently the treatments used are called disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that act similarly to chemotherapy in suppressing the adaptive immune system. DMTs work on the different T-cells active in the auto immune pathogenesis of MS. (1) The issue with DMTs is they are working at the peripheral immune system in an attempt to protect against the T-cell infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS). Current and new research is suggesting alternatives through CNS protection of oligodendrocytes. Two novel approaches have recently been pre-clinically discovered, Sephin1/BZA co-treatment by Dr. Chen (2) and small molecules that mediate GluA2 receptors reducing excitotoxicity by Dr. Fang Liu (3).
Considering both drugs in each lab works as CNS protection
compared to DMTs there could be benefits to working on a combined Sephin1 and
designer drug approach. (3) In Dr. Fang Lui’s lab he used a cuprizone model
without inflammation which Dr. Chen used but included a double transgenic mouse
for inflammation. If the Sephin1 can protect and delay on set of disease
through prolonging ISR, it can allow targeted designer drugs to reduce
glutamate excitotoxicity. This would be more beneficial than BZA because it
only reduced the g-ratio, but designer drugs have all the postive effects on
all markers plus it reduces overall clinical scores. Sephin1 only delays onset
of the disease and does not reduce end stage disease progression. These two
treatments combined with traditional DMTs to reduce overall T-cell activation
and adaptive auto immune system response can be an extremely powerful treatment
strategy. The issues will be getting Sephin1 and designer drugs through the rigorous
FDA testing and clinical trials. Even in clinical trials human MS is different
than EAE or cuprizone with inflammation, which could cause lack of continuity.
Overall, there are millions of potential compounds
that can be synthesized and using AI to find which one’s act on specfic targets
allows for drug designing to be maximally effective. Taking these designed drugs
and combining treatments can be extremely effect, especially in CNS protection
strategies in MS. The current DMTs heavy use in MS can be reduced by these molecular
repair approaches.
References
1. Robertson, D., & Moreo, N. (2016). Disease-Modifying
therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Overview and treatment Considerations. PubMed,
33(6), 28–34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30766181
2. Chen, Y., Podojil, J. R., Kunjamma, R. B., Jones, J. S.,
Weiner, M., Lin, W., Miller, S. D., & Popko, B. (2019). Sephin1, which
prolongs the integrated stress response, is a promising therapeutic for
multiple sclerosis. Brain, 142(2), 344–361.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy322
3. News-Medical.net. (2023, December 11). Small
molecule drug shows promise as potential new treatment for multiple sclerosis.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231208/Small-molecule-drug-shows-promise-as-potential-new-treatment-for-multiple-sclerosis.aspx
4. Zhai, D., Yan, S., Samsom, J., Wang, L.,
Su, P., Jiang, A., Zhang, H., Jia, Z., Wallach, I., Heifets, A., Zanato, C.,
Tseng, C., Wong, A. H., Greig, I. R., & Liu, F. (2023). Small-molecule
targeting AMPA-mediated excitotoxicity has therapeutic effects in mouse models
for multiple sclerosis. Science Advances, 9(49).
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj6187
No comments:
Post a Comment