Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Katie Jabaay's Post: The Power of Scent

Katie Jabaay's Post

 Power of Scent

    Scent is a powerful tool to creatures on this Earth. Odors alert organisms to threats, food, mates, and other important aspects to life while also being retained and influential to the storage of memories. Scent in humans has all of those traits and more, as we can explicitly  label scents and have deep associations with both good and bad memories, especially in those with mental illnesses. Two articles touch on olfaction’s effect on humans are “What the nose knows” and “Something doesn’t smell right” respectively written by Colleen Walsh and Peter Reuele of Harvard University. 

    The article “What the nose knows” gives the succinct explanation of the connection between scent and emotion. Taking the more literary route, the article describes the initiation of a memory via a specific smell as a Proustian moment. The article goes on to explain that the connection between the olfactory bulb, the amygdala and the hippocampus heavily contribute to the connection smell has to one’s emotion and memory. Smell is so immersive and crucial to one’s experience that it forms one's sense of taste, creates a signature brand for companies, becomes associated with colors, and creates a foundation of childhood memories that will create likes and dislikes for ages. The monopolization of scent was a focal point of the article, as it is a relatively new phenomenon to use scents on normally non-scented products in order to appeal to a specific audience or outcompete others. Creating scented products for a clothing line, making film that pairs with scented air, and fragrant hotels are new markets that are on the rise and being researched and pushed by scientists such as Dawn Goldworm, Venkatesh Murthy, and David Edwards. 

    While the previous article focuses on the positive sides of smell, the second article, “Something doesn’t smell right,” explains the recent finding of a specific olfactory sensor that is specific for rancid odors. Trace amine-associated receptors, or TAARs, are specific receptors in the olfactory bulb that are entirely distinct from the average, and more populous, odorant receptors. TAARs are specifically activated during the sensation of cadaverine and putrescine scents, meaning they are specifically geared towards smells of rotting and death. These receptors, for most animals, send the message that something is wrong, making those smells bad. The fact that creatures are born with these receptors provides evidence for the idea that animals, and even humans, have scents that are innately labeled as bad; this means that smell preferences are in fact partially influenced by genetics rather than only socialization and associations. 

     Connecting to these ideals is the article "Odor modulates the temporal dynamics of fear memory consolidation" by Grella et al., where the effects of odor on the encoding and storage of memory is explored. The study focused on three theories, being the systems consolidation, competitive trace and multiple trace theory. Systems consolidation theory states that with time memories become less detailed with time and consequently change from being stored in the hippocampus to the prefrontal cortex. Multiple trace theory states that the episodic and semantic memories, as in memories with high levels of detail, are stored in the hippocampus, whereas less detailed memories are stored in the prefrontal cortex. Competitive trace elaborates these ideas and states that though memories become more remote with time, they can also be re-contextualized. Mice with PTSD had problems with the fear conditioned memories since they were stored in the hippocampus and were readily available instead of being stored remotely in the prefrontal cortex. The connection to the previous articles lies in the fact that the genetically modified mice were fear conditioned, pairing specific scents and electric shocks. The mice learned to associate the scents with the shock, causing a fear response from the mere odor, and the fear-memory was readily available in the hippocampus. 

    The reason that the “What the nose knows” and “Something doesn’t smell right” connect to the paper by Grella et al. is that there are many possible implications of the work. If Walsh’s predictions are true and scent can really be utilized for intentional and successful marketing, then this can be taken to the extreme with the knowledge that some scents are innately good or bad. Finding a receptor for an inherently good scent could maximize the marketing of anything from clothing to vacations, and perhaps a more likely first step could be using it in pet treats or toys since it can be easier to determine animals’ innately good or bad receptors. In a similar fashion, there could be the possibility for those with PTSD and other mental illnesses with symptoms triggered by scents be trained with new, innately pleasant scents during therapy. Since there is the possibility for naturally pleasant and enticing odors and there’s the knowledge that PTSD memories are held as new and adaptable in the brain, associating a new and pleasant emotion with a traumatic memory could potentially ease the negative response with the natural positive one. However, steps would need to be taken to regulate the amount of positive odors that are used in order to not associate more scents with a traumatic memory or response. More broadly, positive scents could be used during therapy to facilitate the eliciting positive emotions and negating the negative ones during emotionally taxing conversations. Overall, odors are an overlooked aspect to daily life, marketing, research, and therapeutic treatments for how influential it is to human and animal neurology. More research into this topic could yield a flourishing new market and possible improvement for the treatment of those with mental illnesses. 


Bibliography

Grella, Stephanie L., et al. “Odor Modulates the Temporal Dynamics of Fear Memory Consolidation.” Learning and Memory, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.19.881615.

Reuell, Peter. “Something Doesn't Smell Right.” Harvard Gazette, Harvard Gazette, 15 Jan. 2014, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/01/something-doesnt-smell-right/.

Walsh, Colleen. “How Scent, Emotion, and Memory Are Intertwined - and Exploited.” Harvard Gazette,  Harvard Gazette, 27 Feb. 2020, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/02/how-                           scent-emotion-and-memory-are-intertwined-and-exploited/. 

Tuesday, October 19, 2021

Therapeutic Implications Regarding Lucid Dream Research

Within the realm of sleep and dream studies, the scientific community has noted the apparent discrepancies that become evident regarding dream reports in that when individuals awake from their dreams, they have the general tendency to misinterpret and/ or forget the events they just experienced while asleep. In the article, Real-time dialogue between experimenters and dreams during REM sleep, Konkoly, and colleagues attempt to bridge this gap by focusing on the potential of dreaming individuals logically perceiving and responding to questions while simultaneously asleep in a laboratory setting. They created a two-way communication study utilizing polysomnography technology in an attempt to bring forward real-time lucid dream communication through means of distorted reality trials throughout the duration of REM sleep. Konkoly et. al were able to come to the conclusion that cognitive characteristics of lucid dreaming are in fact able to be manipulated and cross-examined instantaneously while an individual is still experiencing the dream at hand. 

With this field of research gaining recent attention due to the ramifications of extra free time during the lockdown and people having more time to dream, scientists have posed the question: could the manipulation of lucid dreaming potentially give rise to restorative treatment regarding an individual’s mental health? Or, on the other hand, would tackling the psyche be too risky and unintentionally harm one’s internal mindset and wellbeing? In the article, Does Lucid Dreaming Help Your Mental Health or Harm It? Experts Weigh In, Karen Sosnoski expanded on the under-researched emotional ramifications behind lucid dreaming. She notes how researchers commonly utilize electroencephalograms in order to track signals prompted throughout the duration of lucid dreaming within the prefrontal cortex, given that it is predominately connotated with the progression of personality traits. A 2018 study came to the conclusion that lucid dreamers have the tendency to display elevated levels of resting-state communication- specifically between the frontopolar cortex and the temporoparietal junction. These heightened connections enable the individual to more efficiently incorporate elements of their waking life into their dreams and sometimes even gain control of their actions within this alternate reality. An International Dream Research Survey analyzed the responses brought forward from a group of 528 lucid dreamers. These individuals reported utilizing the practice of lucid dreaming for spiritual growth, solving problems, and emotional healing. Additionally, in the article, What are lucid dreams, and are they clinically significant?, Naveed Saleh reflects on the potential medical implications behind active dreaming. Researchers at the Institute for Consciousness and Dream Research conducted a separate study in which they explore the potential for lucid dreaming to serve as a treatment for patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. As established by the patient’s self-assessments, lucid dream therapy resulted in an overall decrease in anxiety and depression over the course of the trials. 

In line with COVID-19, lucid dream researcher Daniel Love states that the pandemic has encouraged “a new influx of dream explorers.” Taking into consideration that individuals around the world faced a prolonged duration of time spent within their homes, it unintentionally fostered an introspective environment where people were left alone with their thoughts. Mankind throughout the dawn of time has been subjected to the phenomena of dreaming and the thematic representations and imagery conjured by our thoughts yield great levels of curiosity. Scientists have recently begun to further explore the various techniques by which an individual’s dream activity can be properly analyzed and manipulated. As noted by Konkoly et. al, communication within a state of sleep is entirely feasible and its potential is rapidly on the rise. This field of research could broaden the scientific communities’ awareness in regard to the personal human condition and the significance of one’s mental and emotional health as displayed by manifestations while dreaming. This practice holds a vast realm of potential regarding interactive dreaming having therapeutic implications. 


References: 


Konkoly, K. R., Appel, K., Chabani, E., Mangiaruga, A., Gott, J., Mallett, R., Caughran, B.,Witkowski, S., Whitmore, N. W., Mazurek, C. Y., Berent, J. B., Weber, F. D., Türker, B., Leu-Semenescu, S., Maranci, J. B., Pipa, G., Arnulf, I., Oudiette, D., Dresler, M., & Paller, K. A. (2021). Real-time dialogue between experimenters and dreamers during REM sleep. Current Biology, 31(7), 1417–1427.e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.026

Naveed, Saleh. “What Are Lucid Dreams, and Are They Clinically Significant?” MDLinx, 14 Jan. 2019, https://www.mdlinx.com/article/what-are-lucid-dreams-and-are-they-clinically-significant

Sosnoski, Karen. “This Is How Lucid Dreaming Affects Your Mental Health.” Healthline, Healthline Media,19 Aug. 2021, https://www.healthline.com/health/lucid-dreaming-the-latest-on-its-mental-health-benefits-and-risks