In Frankenstein’s Cat,
Emily Anthes goes into many of the ethical concerns surrounding biotechnology,
including the controversy surrounding genetic engineering. She briefly mentions
a gene called FOXP2, which is associated with speech and language functions in
humans. I was very interested in this gene’s effect when expressed in mice and
decided to find some more news on the subject.
An article on Phys.org called “Of mice and melodies:
Research on language gene seeks to uncover the origins of the singing mouse”
explains the findings of Stephen Phelps, a researcher at the University of
Texas at Austin. The research focuses on a species of Costa Rican mice that
communicates through song. These male mice use chirping sounds for displays of
dominance, attraction of mates, and long-distance communication. Phelps’
research focuses on the FOXP2 gene and how it differs in these signing mice
compared to lab mice and humans.
In humans, a mutation of the FOXP2 gene can cause many
language problems and is implicated in language deficits in individuals with
autism. As a transcription factor, FOXP2 regulates the expression of other genes.
Therefore, a mutation in FOXP2 can cause the malfunction of all the other genes
it regulates. As a result, individuals with mutations of FOXP2 show a variety
of language deficits: difficulty with grammar and mouth movements needed to
speak clearly being two examples. Studying this gene may lead to greater
understanding of its role in vocalization.
Emily Anthes describes the research of another lab in
Germany that actually engineers lab mice to express the human form of FOXP2.
These mice show alterations in their neurons’ size and shape as well as
alterations in the sounds they produce.
This research raises ethical concerns for many people. If we begin altering the cognitive
functions of animals using human genes, at what point do these animals become
more man than mouse? If this research significantly improves the quality of
life of individuals with autism, is the cost of these alterations offset? Furthermore, how much responsibility do
scientists have in ensuring future research in the field does not cross these
ethical boundaries? These are ethical grey areas will need to be addressed as
biotechnology continues to advance.
Sources:
Anthes, E.
(2013). Frankenstein's Cat: Cuddling up
to Biotech’s Brave New Beasts. New York, NY: Scientific American / Farrar,
Straus and Giroux.
Of mice and
melodies: Research on language gene seeks to uncover the origins of the singing
mouse. (2012, August 10). In Phys.org.
Retrieved October 11, 2013, from
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-mice-melodies-language-gene-uncover.html
No comments:
Post a Comment