One of the most intriguing fields
of modern science is biotechnology and the genetic modification of animals. It
is still a relatively new field, only a few decades along, but it has stirred
up plenty of debate and controversy. At the center of these debates is the
ethical dilemma of genetic modification of animals, but this issue is multi
faceted. First, should animals be used for testing? If animals can feel pain,
and taking an animal out of its natural environment to foreign conditions
causes distress, is this an ethical practice? Secondly, should we be
experimenting with these animals and trying to “create” new variants of an
already existing organism? Are we “playing God” by doing this?
These are
all very valid questions that don’t have a clear cut answer, and thus are the
reason for the proponents and opponents of genetic modification. However,
regardless of what stance one may believe in, one thing is for sure: genetic
modification can help, not only
humans, but other animals, and thus, nature and the Earth as a whole. The
potential implications that genetic modification can have are immense. The
field can be extremely beneficial to the world if it were unanimously accepted
as an ethical practice that should be allowed to continue.
If this
field of science can be so beneficial, then why is there so much opposition to
it? While genetic modification may hurt some animals, it has the potential to
help many more. If one believes that those participating in genetic
modification are “playing God”, are doctors who save lives doing the same?
Because the essential goal of genetic modification is to help humans, as well
as other organisms live better lives. As Emily Anthes states in Frankenstein’s Cat: Cuddling Up to Biotech’s
Brave New Beasts: “The important thing is that we do not throw the
genetically modified baby out with the bathwater. We spend so much time
discussing the ethics of using our emerging scientific capabilities that we
sometimes forget that NOT using them has ethical implications of its own” (2013).
Anthes brings up a very important point. While so much time and effort is spent
wondering whether this whole practice is ethical, not enough time is spent
wondering how ethical it is to let the endless potential of genetically
modified organisms (GMO’s) waste away. There is real benefit that can be had
from this field.
In her
book, Anthes also goes on to discuss that the question is not whether or not
humans should shape animals’ bodies and lives, but rather how we should. This
is because it is downright inevitable that humans affect all other organisms
living on Earth. We are the most dominant species by far, and we play a major
role in the survival of these other organisms. From one point of view, the only
way other organisms can survive in this changing world is if humans help these
species evolve or adapt to the changes. When looking at GMO’s from this point
of view, the only ethical thing to do is continue work in this field.
That there
is real benefit in GMO’s is the main point in Emily Anthes’ New York Times
article Don’t Be Afraid of Genetic
Modification. The article, from March of this year, discusses the biotech
company AquaBounty’s attempt to introduce AquAdvantage salmon, a genetically
modified salmon to the FDA. The salmon would be a cheaper and healthier
alternative to normal salmon bought in the market. However, due to political
pressure stemming from the public’s perception of GMO’s, AquAdvantage is yet to
enter the market. Like this genetically modified salmon, plenty of other
projects attempting to create GMO’s, such as bird flu resistant chicken, low
pollutant swine, and bird flu resistant birds have all met lots of
difficulties, in large part due to opposition stemming from ethical
standpoints. Creating bird flu resistant birds not only helps humans (by making
it harder to infect chicken that we eat), but also helps birds and other
animals survive epidemics that break out.
While those
having ethical dilemmas when facing GMO’s are coming from a good place, these
views must be seriously re-evaluated. There is great human and worldly benefit
that can arise from GMO’s. This field of biotechnology has the potential to
fight widespread epidemics, help all organisms on Earth survive natural
obstacles, and help humans live more comfortably. It is a field whose potential
needs to be realized.
Works
Cited
Anthes,
Emily. "Don't Be Afraid of Genetic Modification." New York Times.
New York Times, 9 Mar. 2013. Web. 11 Oct. 13.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/opinion/sunday/dont-be-afraid-of-genetic-modification.html>.
Anthes, Emily. Frankenstein's
Cat: Cuddling up to Biotech's Brave New Beasts. London: Oneworld, 2013.
Print.
AquAdvantage Salmon. Digital image. AquaBounty. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. <http://www.aquabounty.com/images/AquAdvantage%20Salmon.jpg>.
Bird Flu Chickens. Digital image. Huffington Post. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. <http://i.huffpost.com/gen/237251/thumbs/r-BIRD-FLU-CHICKENS-large570.jpg>.
No comments:
Post a Comment