Working in
research lab where we use mice as part of our experiments has shown me the
importance of animals in medical/biological research. However, it reminds me of
the old times when animals were just kept as pets and used for meat. With
technology on the rise, animals are being used for various purposes, as though
they are just some 'things' available to satisfy our needs. This
brings in the ethical issue of using animals as machines.
In her book
Frankenstein's Cat: cuddling up to biotech's brave new beasts, Emily Anthes
constantly talks about using animals for research and how fruitful that has
been. What striked me the most was the pharming techniques, where animals are
just being used to mass produce medicines. All that needs to be done is to
"take the gene for human antithrombin and injected it directly into
fertilized goat eggs. Then they implanted the eggs in the wombs of female
goat" (Anthes) This was followed by pairing the gene with the promoter that is
active during milk production. Hence, whenever the goats produced milk, the
gene was transcribed too and antithrombin was present in the goat's milk. All
that needed to be done was collecting the milk, extracting it, and purifying
it. This is mind-blowing because it not only saves a ton of money, but can produce
medicine in massive amounts.
The problem,
however, lies in the fact that animals will be used as machines. Rather than
treating them as living things, we will use for our own benefits. What Emily
Anthes mentions is that using animals for our own purposes isn't new. The
question then is if we should object because the technology is. She also
mentions that "biotechnology is not the only solution to what ails
animals, but it's a weapon we now have in our arsenal one set of strategies for
boosting animal health and welfare. If we reject if out of hand, we lose the
good along with the bad" (Anthes). This view is evident in the article
'Gene-altered animals enter a commercial era' by Harold M. Schmeck Jr. The
article describes all the good that has come from transgenic animals: rat milk
that treats heart attack, mice that can inactivate the cancer gene, and pigs
with more lean meat and less fat. These are just some examples among the many
benefits that come from transgenic animals. The good outweighs the bad. This could
open up a new commercial era. The question however is should we be afraid of
technology and what it could turn into.
Other issues
raised in the articles are that "use of the animals could upset
agricultural economics, driving small farmers out of business, that some of the
animals could upset the balance of nature and that the practice may cause
suffering in animals. Some people are simply opposed philosophically to
tinkering with the genetics of a species" (Schmeck Jr) All these are good ethical
question to be raised, but Emily Anthes makes a point when she says that
throwing away this biotechnology means throwing away the good that could come
from it. Given all the benefits we are enjoying through transgenic animals,
these new techniques should be given more support, leading to a new era in
pharmaceuticals.
Another article
that was interesting was focusing on using zebrafish to help search for new
pain durgs. Since neuropathic pain is often hard to study and ethical issues
often come up, Dr. Antonio Giordano and Dr. Gianfranco Bellipanni are
using transgenic fish that will turn fluorescent when they experience pain.
This will help "to characterize better the cellular and molecular
mechanisms of pain" (Scientific American). The goal of the study is to find chemicals that
control analgesic activity. Hence, by modifying the genome of zebrafish a
little, we might be able to make advances in neuropathy. This is another
example of the good that comes from using transgenic animals. Throwing away
such technology due to worry about "overusing" animals puts us at
loss and further hinders our progress. With the emerging technology, the
ethical issues should be left behind and transgenic animals should be used
freely to open up new boundaries not known to man before.
Sources:
Anthes, Emily. Frankenstein’s
Cat: Cuddling Up to Biotech’s Brave New Beasts.
New York: Scientific American. 2013. Print.
"Can the
Zebrafish Help Us to Search for New Pain Drugs?" ScienceDaily.
ScienceDaily, 03 Sept. 2013. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
Jr., Harold M. Schmeck.
"Gene-Altered Animals Enter a Commercial Era." The New York
Times. The New York Times, Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment