I recently had the
opportunity to volunteer in the traumatic brain injury unit of a Chicago
hospital. Some of these patients have been left in a vegetative state
following their injuries. When assisting with their care, I found myself
constantly wondering to what extent, if at all, the patients are conscious.
Can they understand what is being said around them? Are there
things they want to communicate but are simply unable to? Is there
something more in their eyes than a blank screen? It is possible that a
patient who is labeled as being in a "vegetative state" might have
some level of awareness but lacks the ability to express this. In therapy
sessions, a patient might smile, nod, or grunt, leaving us to wonder if there
was any intent behind those gestures or whether it was only random byproduct of
physiology. It was a curious and bewildering experience for me and, of course,
even more so for the patients themselves (assuming consciousness) and their
friends and families. Daniel Bor discusses this subject in his
book, The Ravenous Brain, saying, "Doctors, too ... can often
struggle to disentangle the subtle, inconsistent signs of real awareness from
random sounds and movements." Currently, scientists are working to
try to communicate with those "vegetative" patients who might
actually have awareness. The most promising method so far is via fMRI
and/or EEG, as was famously demonstrated by Dr. Adrian Owen and his team in
their 2006 "tennis study". In
this groundbreaking study, fMRI was used to establish a reliable measure of
consciousness based on areas of brain activation in response to imagination
tasks, playing tennis specifically. Bor
details this study and those that have built on it, which have been able to
show strong evidence of awareness in patients previously classified as
vegetative.
And
now, a new study published by researchers at the University of Cambridge and
the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, has used EEG to establish
certain brain networks to be associated with consciousness in patients who are
unresponsive (in either vegetative or minimally conscious states). They found that these networks are activated
equivalently in both healthy patients and some
patients who are unable to give physical responses. This is compelling evidence that it is
possible to identify physically unresponsive patients who are conscious and to
actually communicate with them. Using
EEG is much more practical and less expensive than using fMRI so these new
findings could provide a very useful diagnostic tool for doctors in the future.
There
is more work to be done in order to refine these methods and also, as is
characteristic and necessary in science, new questions arise. One of these which weighs on my mind is, if
we are now able to communicate with patients trapped in unresponsive bodies,
how will they answer when asked if they want to continue on life support?
References:
Bor,
D. (2012). The ravenous brain: How the new science of consciousness
explains our insatiable search for meaning. New York: Basic Books.
University
of Cambridge. (2014, October 16). Scientists find 'hidden brain signatures' of
consciousness in vegetative state patients. ScienceDaily. Retrieved October 17, 2014 from
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/14