Although
scientific advances have allowed us to travel to the moon and back, there is
yet no concrete understanding of consciousness. Consciousness is what seemingly
drives our everyday actions and yet we have no idea how it is created in the
brain or what it is exactly. This imperfect understanding of consciousness and
in turn unconsciousness therefore, limits success in several sectors of the
healthcare system.
One such sector that is limited by
the ambiguity of consciousness is that of anesthesia. The article titled What Anesthesia Can Teach Us About
Consciousness by Maggie Koerth-Baker claims that .13 percent of the time
the effects of anesthesia go awry. Even though the rates of success in
anesthesia are high, the one or two failures in a group of a 1,000 people force
us to inquire as to why that is the case. Since the field of anesthetics is
centered on using specific drugs to control the consciousness of a patient, it
becomes essential for us to have a complete understanding of consciousness in
order to perform successful anesthesia.
The article states that because
there is not a way to measure consciousness directly, neuroscientists are looking
to study neural correlates of consciousness – the changes in brain function
when a person shifts from being conscious to unconscious. They performed a
study that stimulated patients’ brains at different levels of consciousness and
compared their brain activity. They discovered that when the patient was awake
and conscious, the electrical signal travelled all around the brain. When the patient
was unconscious, the signal remained localized and eventually faded away. This
discovery supports a theory of consciousness that states that sensory networks
in the brains of an unconscious person are locally functional but the
communication between different parts of the brain is compromised. The analogy described in the article that clarified this concept was imagining that the lights are on in the neighborhood, but "the Internet and phone lines have been cut". It's fascinating to imagine consciousness to be so simple and yet so complex. Increasing
support for this theory allows some neuroscientists to conclude that the
synthesis and integration of information between the different parts of the
brain provides the best measure of consciousness.
Additional research and significant
results in correspondence with this theory can substantially decrease the
uncertainties involved with diagnosing a patient’s state of consciousness. As
Daniel Bor describes in The Ravenous
Brain, a patient that is entirely unconscious with his eyes always closed
is in coma. If there are signs of awareness, such as the opening and closing of
eyes, the patient is in a vegetative state. When a patient shows slight
awareness and responds to stimuli, he is in a minimally conscious state.
Although many patients can make a recovery from a vegetative state, about half
of them do not. The longer a patient remains in the vegetative state, the lower
his chances of recovering from that state. Additionally, it is extremely
difficult to ascertain the difference between a patient in a vegetative state
and one in a minimally conscious state. Methods that distinguish between the
states of consciousness of a patient similar to the one described by the
article can have a substantial effect in helping healthcare professionals
classify the conscious level of a minimally responsive patient. Even though
classifying a patient’s state of consciousness is only half of the battle that
doctors and family members have to struggle through, it can allow them to
determine the best course of action for the patient with less ambiguity.
Therefore, I believe that more research should be done in order to develop an
appropriate method of measuring consciousness. This will not only assist in developing
a more successful method of anesthetization, but will also give doctors a
better understanding of the conscious state of a patient that will allow them
to better approach his condition.
Bor, Daniel. The
Ravenous Brain: How the New Science of Consciousness Explains Our Insatiable
Search for Meaning. New York: Basic, 2012. Print.
Koerth-Baker,
Maggie. “What Anesthesia Can Teach Us About Consciousness.” The New York Times.
The New York Times, 10 Dec. 2013. Web. 16 Oct. 2014. <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/15/magazine/what-anesthesia-can-teach-us-about-consciousness.html?pagewanted=all>.
No comments:
Post a Comment