In Daniel Bor’s book The Ravenous Brain, Bor mentions that a
supervisor of his named Adrian Owen conducted a similar study in which he
subjected patients in the vegetative state to auditory stimuli, and also put
them in the fMRI scanner to observe their reactions to the stimuli. Owen
grouped the patients into four categories based on the level of response that
they displayed to the stimuli. He managed to find two patients who ranked in
the highest category of responsiveness, which was the “ability to process the
meaning of words.” (Bor, 227) By observing the reaction of these patients to
auditory stimuli, Owen was able to determine to a certain degree their level of
consciousness as well. He was able to set certain criteria that needed to be
met by the patients for them to be classified into a certain category. Owen also added on to the study mentioned above
by noting that their level of consciousness could help determine or predict “how
much they would recover six months down the line.” (Bor, 228) Owen’s study
seems to have added another aspect to the previously mentioned study by taking
into account the prognosis of the vegetative state patient. The findings of
both of the studies provide insight that should be very helpful for the future
of this area of research. As more becomes known about the vegetative state through
similar studies, a cure may be in arms reach.
Bor, Daniel. The Ravenous Brain: How the New Science of Consciousness Explains Our Insatiable Search for Meaning. New York: Basic, 2012. Print.
University of Cambridge. "Patient in 'vegetative state' not just aware, but paying attention, study suggests." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 31 October 2013. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131031110558.htm>.
No comments:
Post a Comment