There have been recent debates
regarding the matter of ethics in deliberately deleting human memories. Some
argue that it is completely ethical for an individual to delete traumatic
memories that are preventing them from living a normal life, and others argue
that it is completely unethical. Many of those arguing against deleting
memories explain that memories are what make us who we are and make us behave
the way we do and that to delete our memories is to alter, change, and destroy
who we are as individuals.
Recent
studies at the Radbound University Nijmegan in the Netherlands have shown that
electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) allows individuals to delete traumatic
memories. The study shows that conducting ECT while an individual is retrieving
a particular traumatic memory will allow for that memory to be deleted in that
individual’s mind. The individuals that went ECT were then asked multiple
choice questions a week later regarding the traumatic event they went through
and they performed very poorly on these exams because they couldn’t recall the
event or the details of the event.
However
there have been studies and arguments by many scientists including Dr. Arthur
Caplan, head of the division of the Bioethics department at NYU, that claim
that deleting memories does not change the individual’s personality.
Regardless
of whether an individual’s personality is altered or not after they have
deleted particular memories doesn’t mean that their future will not be altered.
Altering an individual’s memory will allow them to lose potential ambitions for
the future; if many of our social justice leaders underwent memory deletion
they probably would not have fought for the causes they dedicated their life to
and would not have created a positive impact in the world. Those traumatic
memories were what motivated them to change the world and the society we live
in to prevent others from experiencing those memories.
However
there are individuals who suffer from PTSD and by deleting those memories it
could allow them to live a better life, Dr. Liao and Sandberg explain that if
deleting a memory doesn’t endanger the individual or the people around them
then it should be up to them whether they decide to delete the memory or not.
As memory
modification techniques increase the debates of whether it is ethical to delete
an individual’s memory will continue to increase as well. Ethical boundaries and
limits also have to be set regarding what permits an individual from deleting a
memory. Does deleting an individual’s memory simply because it is unpleasant make
it ok if it doesn’t harm the individual or those around them or do they have to
have PTSD in order for memory deletion to be considered ethical? All of these
are questions and debates that we will see increasing throughout the next few
years as MMTs continue to increase.
Sources:
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/the-ethics-of-erasing-bad-memories/362110/
Liao, S. M., & Sandberg, A. (2008). The Normativity of
Memory Modification. Neuroethics. 1(2), 85-99,
doi:10.1007/s12512-008-9009-5
Images:
http://gelookahead.economist.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/012814Slide2-581x425.png
Images:
http://gelookahead.economist.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/012814Slide2-581x425.png
No comments:
Post a Comment