People
make decisions every single day. The question is: are these decisions made
freely or are they determined? Studies show that the brain is capable of
unconsciously making decisions prior to one’s conscious awareness. The article What Neuroscience Says about Free Will suggests
that the idea of free will may be an illusion of the brain. Dr. Vukov refutes the
claim that there is no free will by arguing that this conclusion cannot be accurately
deduced from current studies.
In
the article What Neuroscience Says about
Free Will, experimenters Bloom and Bear theorize that our minds re-write
history. They imply that we may not have a choice, or free will, at all if our
minds follow this process: we unconsciously observe ourselves performing an
action, and then only after are we able to consciously perceive that action as
intentional.1 If we make a decision unconsciously, our conscious
mind did not choose that decision; rather, our conscious mind only recognized
that this decision was made, and it concludes that the result was its intention
all along. This implies that there was no free will to make a decision— the
decision was already subconsciously made. Thus, Bloom and Bear suggest that
this concept of free will is an illusion, as the decision has already been made
unconsciously, prior to awareness.
In order to prove that
the unconscious is responsible for making decisions, an experiment was
conducted. Each subject had to choose which of the five dots on the screen
would turn red and report their initial predictions after seeing which dot had
in fact turned red. When the answer was quickly displayed, people reported
their predictions to have a higher accuracy rate than expected. When there was a delay in the answer being displayed,
the reported predictions were much closer to the expected results. This time
delay prevented the subconscious from being able to observe the answer before a
conscious choice was decided. This suggests that the unconscious was observing the answer,
and the conscious became aware of the answer and thought that it had predicted
the correct answer from the beginning. Thus, the unconscious is responsible for
making decisions prior to awareness.
Some
people conclude that there is no free will because our brain decides to do
things before we are aware of what we have decided. Dr. Vukov, a professor from
Loyola University, provided five reasons as to why this conclusion is unable to
be deduced from a neuroscientific standpoint. These reasons include: faults
with empirical data, the ambiguity of various definitions of free will, the
issue that probability does not negate free will, the complexity of free
actions, and the fact that free actions do not need to be conscious. While Dr.
Vukov does not say that there is no free will, he does provide evidence that
the unconscious makes decisions ten seconds prior to one’s awareness of that
decision. 2Thus, this directly relates to the discussion of free
will in the aforementioned article.
Therefore, the question of whether or not a person is free or determined has been unable to be answered. Cases can be made in support of each argument, and while it can be shown that the unconscious makes decisions prior to conscious awareness, it cannot be proved there is no free will. Thus, free will cannot be neuroscientifically disproved from the information provided. Free will may simply be an illusion and not exist, or is may exist. It is important for the interdisciplinary fields of neuroscience, philosophy and ethics to come together to discuss this issue and do additional research to reach a conclusion.
Resources:
1. A. Bear, “What Neuroscience Says about Free Will,” Scientific
American, 28 April 2016, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/what-neuroscience-says-about-free-will/, date accessed October 17th, 2017.
2.
Soon, et al. ”Unconscious
determinants of free decisions in the human brain,” https://luc.app.box.com/v/neuroseminar/file/216116077901, date accessed October 17th, 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment