People have always been fascinated by the minds
of psychopaths. Validation of this ranges from its prevalence in mainstream
media, to the abundance of horror flicks produced each year, to the popularity
of TV series like American Horror Story, featuring this
season’s beloved psychopath, “Dandy.” And fascinated we should be, the impact
psychopaths have on society and the criminal justice system is tremendous.
According to an article by Kent Kiehl and Morris Hoffman (2011), “Psychopaths
are twenty to twenty-five times more likely than non-psychopaths to be in
prison, four to eight times more likely to violently recidivate compared to
non-psychopaths, and are resistant to most forms of treatment.” This is why
research on the mind of individuals with psychopathic personality is so
imperative—the pursuance of developing successful treatment options. Moreover,
not only does this research shed light on the mysteries of psychopathic
tendencies, but also the functionality and underlying mental processes of the
normal human brain.
Kiehl, who has been studying the neurology of
psychopaths for decades, has found that many of the behavioral markers of
psychopathy, such as a lack of empathy, moral conscious, and a poor response to
fear, appear to be intimately linked with the paralimbic regions. Specifically,
fMRI scans show reduced activity in the amygdala, and anterior and posterior
cingulate, as well as increased activity in the lateral frontal cortex in
comparison to non-psychopaths (Kiehl & Hoffman). In the words of Kiehl,
“These findings dovetail nicely with the central paradox of the psychopath: he
is completely rational but morally insane. He is missing the moral core, which
seems to be largely connected to the paralimbic regions.”
(Figure above from "the fMRI of an
Affective Memory Task in Criminal Psychopaths showing reduced activity in paralimbic
regions—amygdala, anterior and posterior cingulate—and increased activity in
the lateral frontal cortex, an area typically associated with cognition, not
emotion" (Kiehl & Hoffman).
In light of their findings, and in combination
with several other treatment theories, Kiehl and Hoffman developed a therapy
program they termed “decompression treatment,” that focuses on mending the
social deficits present in psychopaths. The treatment was significantly more
effective than any previous treatment of psychopathy; however, this doesn’t
necessarily mean that the effects of the treatment were particularly sizable.
In fact, therapies until recent have proven time and time again that treatment
of psychopaths is incorrigible. What is more, some treatments, such as group
therapy, have the possibility of making matters worse, increasing psychopathic
tendencies.
Because decompression treatment is very intense,
requiring one on one therapeutic treatment that lasts several hours a day for a
minimum of six months, the program is very costly. However, due to the high
costs of incarceration, the initial high cost of the program was made up for by
its effectiveness.
Nevertheless, there is still need for a less
time consuming program that illuminates and targets the core functional neural
mechanisms underlying the individual emotional, cognitive, and social markers
of psychopathy, rather than a holistic top-down treatment approach.
One study that specifically focuses on the
individual differences between psychopathological disorders and the underlying
neural mechanisms responsible for these individual differences is a study
conducted by Arielle Baskin-Sommers, John Curtin, and Joseph Newman (2014). In
the study, Baskin-Sommers et al. used cognitive remediation; a type of therapy
that exercises the brain using specifically developed cognitive tasks, in order
to target the individual deficit a patient is suffering from. Here,
Baskin-Sommers et al. is focusing on a technique that was mentioned by Kiehl in
his research; because brain-scan imaging technology has allowed researchers to
pinpoint regions with abnormal activity in specific psychopathological
disorders, this information can be used to facilitate synaptic strengthening in
deficient regions with such cognitive exercises.
In brief, the method of the study consisted of
assessing male prison inmates for either psychopathy or externalizing
personalities and those who met the criteria were then randomly selected and
divided into different cognitive remediation groups that specifically targeted
each disorder. The first group contained both psychopaths and inmates with
externalizing personalities and they received “interpersonal and situational
cues and changes in their environment,” which was designed to improve
psychopathic cognitive deficits. The second group was hypothesized to improve
externalizing personality disorder deficits by teaching inmates ”to engage in
affective cognitive control by acting rather than over-reacting to affective
information.”
As predicted, the results showed that
psychopaths in the attention to context condition, which was specifically
designed to target a cognitive impairment of psychopaths, yielded significant
improvements in performance, while externalizing inmates’ performance did not
improve. Externalizing inmates did improve in the second cognitive remediation
condition, which focused on affective cognitive control, and psychopaths did
not show any improvement.
In view of these findings, it’s evident that
cognitive remediation is an effective method of targeting specific cognitive
deficits that are markers of psychopathological disorders, such as cognitive
attention to context in psychopathy. Specifically, Baskin-Sommers et al.’s
research has demonstrated that specific underlying neural mechanisms of
psychopathy can be targeted for neuroplasticity training with a less time
consuming program than decompression treatment.
Taken together, the studies by Kiehl and
Hoffman, and Baskin-Sommers et al. give hope that psychopathy can be
effectively treated with continued research for targeted, thoughtful treatment
design efforts. Further research should possibly focus on the effects such
cognitive remedial therapies would have on juveniles.
Baskin-Sommers, A.R., Curtin, J.J., &
Newman, J.P. (2014). Altering the Cogntive-Affective Dysfunctions of
Psychopathic and Externalizing Offender Subtypes with Cognitive Remediation.
Clinical Psychological Science.
Kiehl, K. A., & Hoffman, M. B. (2011). The
criminal psychopath: History, neuroscience, treatment, and economics. Institute
of National Health, 51, 355-397.
where are these treatments?
ReplyDelete