Creativity
has often been looked as a way to fuel society. With the idea of new
innovations and technology, creativity is often looked upon as a viable asset
to many industries. One huge industry that has flourished due to the creative
minds is the industry of the arts: the paintings, music, and literature that
has inspired and continues to inspire society today. But many have criticized
the art industry of “promoting” drugs in order to illicit creative behavior.
This is seen through the countless achievements of artists today who admit to
the use of drugs and credit drugs as the source of creativity. So the question
arises: Are drugs a useful inducer of creative thought?
In Dr. Zabelina’s experiment, she sought to understand
the role of attention in creative thought. By gathering a roomful of creative
experts in music, literature, culinary skills, etc., she tested whether these
experts were more capable to switch attention and focus on the larger picture, which
is called the attentional flexibility hypothesis. In the end, her results
showed that creative people were in fact less capable of attention flexibility.
They were slower at changing their attention between varying stimuli, and were
often attention persistent, where they focused on a stimuli very attentively.
This shows the attentiveness many artists display when creating a creative
piece.
In Creativity,
Madness and Drugs, by R. Douglas Fields, he notes the power of the drugs
and mental disorders to illicit creative thoughts. He notes writers like Edgar
Allen Poe who suffered from bipolar disorder, or Van Gogh who suffered from
borderline personality, and questions if they would have been able to produce
creative works had they been treated for their respective mental illness. While
he lauds their ability to produce such creative works in spite of their
suffering from mental diseases, he is worried about artists who use drugs to
inspire their mind. Artists such as The Beatles and Graham Nash have confessed
to the use of drugs such as LSD, cocaine, and methamphetamines to help in
writing the music. Nash talked about how drugs opened his mind up emotionally
and was able to focus on writing music that was important. However, Fields is
worried about the consumption of drugs to achieve state of madness as they have
ill effects that cause many to suffer and die from. Drug addiction has become a
problem in the art industry as actors, and musicians have acquired the use of
drugs to achieve “transcendent” thoughts and a persistent attention to mold their
craft. Dr. Zabelina shows evidence that persistent attention does lead to more
creative ideas, and can explain why many artists use drugs to induce high
activity of the brain in attention, emotion, etc. However, the article Creativity, Madness and Drugs ask us to
think whether creative success is incentive enough to require the need of drugs.
As we grasp a better understanding of how the brain works to help
creativity, we will seek to learn more about the effects of the drugs in
inducing creative behavior and the ethical issues that surround it.
Zabelina, D., Beeman, M. (2013) Short-term
attentional perseveration associated with real-life creative achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-8
Fields, D. R. (November 22, 2013) Creativity,
madness and drugs. Scientific American.
Retrieved December 10, 2014. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/2013/11/22/creativity-madness-and-drugs/
No comments:
Post a Comment