As of
late, neuroscientists have been conducting more research on threats and fear.
These studies will provide insight on how diseases such as post-traumatic
stress disorder and certain phobias must be dealt with. Although more
information is needed to develop cures, these studies are a step in the right
direction and will serve as a base to the progressive research of the future in
this field.
In their study, Intuitively detecting what is hidden within
a visual mask, neuroscientists Anne Cleary, Anthony Ryals, and Jason
Nomi prove that humans are capable of “Recognition Without Identification"
(RWI), more commonly known as “gut feelings” or instinct. These gut feelings
arise in situations where an individual does not have sufficient information.
Thus, he or she must rely on instinct to act appropriately.
Their
study focuses largely on the evolutionary implications of RWI. Their research
suggests that RWI is an evolutionary product, and they test this by having the
research participants’ view threatening images. The images were obscured with
Photoshop and the participants wore masks to hinder their identification. The
participants were able to recognize over 32% of the threatening images, versus
only 1% of non-threatening ones. This highlights that this trait is
evolutionary since it has been favorable for people to recognize threats in the
past, to help them survive those threats. Their traits would be passed down
(including RWI abilities) while the genes of those that did not survive would eventually
be eradicated from the gene pool.
Recently,
a research team led by Urs Meyer, a staff member of the Laboratory of
Physiology & Behaviour at ETH Zurich, has discovered where these gut feelings
in response to threats arise from. It is not only a product of the brain as
expected, but the stomach sends signals to the brain in a situation with a
threat present. The brain will read these signals and will then translate them
into fear, so that the body may act accordingly. The vagus nerve sends signals
to both organs in each direction. The nerves extending from the brain to the
internal organs are termed the efferent nerves, and those from the stomach to
the brain are the afferent nerves. When the afferent nerves were cut in rats,
they responded with less fear to threats.
This study demonstrates that the feelings
felt by humans in the former study, was induced by the vagus nerve sending
signals from the stomach to the brain. Without this nerve, humans would be less
adapted to recognize threats and would be less efficient in responding in a
logical manner. However, they would still be able to recognize learned threats
from the past, since cutting the afferent nerves did not affect learned fear.
When the rats in Meyer’s study were conditioned to link a sound to an
unpleasant experience, the vagus nerve played no role and they still
experienced fear with cut afferent nerves.
It is
now clear that the stomach, not only the brain, plays a significant role in how
we respond to fear. However, although it is clear that there are signals sent
to the brain from the stomach, it is still not clear what those signals are.
Scientists are still trying to determine the role of the vagus nerve and the
dialogue between the brain and the body. More information on fear and how it
functions in the body will provide insight on how we must handle diseases such
as post-traumatic stress disorder and certain phobias. If they can learn that the
situation is not threatening in actuality, they can overcome their phobia. Although these
studies are a start, more information is needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment