Despite the fact that humans have been abusing opiates for centuries, the mechanism for how these opiates work in our brains to give us the pleasure of reward is still in its primitive stages. As Dr. Steidl pointed out in his talk, however, it seems that the dopamine system is important. According to his research findings, opiates, such as morphine, activate the dopamine system via disinhibition, a process of inhibiting GABA neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that were inhibiting dopamine release in local neurons and the nucleus accumbens (NAc). But is this the only way that morphine activates the reward system? Could there be inputs from the other parts of the brain that also help activate the dopamine reward system? In order to answer this question, Dr. Steidl and his team looked at morphine-induced locomotion (since dopamine has shown to induce locomotion) between M5-knockout mice and control mice. The M5-muscarinic receptor is found exclusively on dopamine neurons in the VTA and recieves cholinergic input from the pedunculopontine tegmental nuclei (PPTg). They found that these M5-knockout mice showed reduced morphine-induced locomotion. This allowed Dr. Steidl to summarize that in addition to the disinhibition of the GABA neurons, this cholinergic pathway is also important in morphine-induced activation of the dopamine system.
There are numerous other studies that look at the mechanism of the opiate-induced activation of the dopamine system. The study by Hnasko et. al. looks at the bigger picture and looks at morphine reward in dopamine-deficient mice. What if someone took away all the dopamine in a mice brain. How would the mice react compared to normal mice and would morphine have an effect on it. They found that these dopamine-deficient mice were severely hypoactive, hypophagic, and required daily administration of L-dopa to prevent starvation. This shows us exactly how important dopamine is to our daily behavior. Without it, the simplest pleasures and even essentials of life don't seem important. After this administration of L-dopa, these mice were administered morphine and the researchers looked at a number of things. They first looked at morphine-induced locomotion via the open field paradigm (total locomotion in a big box is recorded) and found that these dopamine-deficient mice were very lethargic and showed almost no change in locomotion when compared to basal activity. Next, they looked at pain sensitivity via the tail flick test (light beam focused on mice tail and reaction time measured) and found that the dopamine-deficient mice flicked their tails a lot faster than the normal mice. This led them to believe that dopamine may play a role in suppressing pain. Finally, they looked at reward-seeking behavior via the conditioned place preference test (mice exposed to two rooms and given morphine in one and saline in other; then tested to see which they prefer). They found that these dopamine-deficient mice were able to develop a preference for the morphine-condition room, indicating that dopamine isn't essential for reward-seeking behavior in mice. There has to be a new pathway and the cholinergic pathway that Dr. Steidl found may play a part in it.
Other research have shown that there is a difference in how morphine's rewarding effects activate the dopamine system that depends on whether the mice are morphine-deprived (drug withdrawal) and drug naive. This study by Nader and van der Kooy looked mice who had been grown a dependence on morphine and were experience withdrawal and mice who had never been exposed to morphine. By giving these mice either a dopamine antagonist or lesions on the PPTg, these researchers found that in deprived mice, morphine's rewarding effect is dopamine-mediated (only deprived mice failed to develop conditioned place preference for morphine environment when given dopamine antagonists) while in naive mice, morphine's rewarding effect is PPTg-mediated (only naive mice failed to develop conditioned place preference for morphine environment when given PPTg lesions). This further provides evidence of a cholinergic pathway originating in the PPTg that is involved in morphine's rewarding that Dr. Steidl proposes.
In conclusion, this is just a simple preview of the research involved with how researchers think morphine, and similar opiates, affect the mice brain. Due to the fact that Dr. Steidl research is fairly new and still has found something so novel, it is necessary to look at this further. By blocking these pathways, it may be possible to help drug addicts recovering from opiates, since they are highly addicting. However, this would be futile if we weren't aware of all the pathways that morphine acts through. If we try to block only the ones we know, we will be wasting time and money because the morphine will still have its affect through different pathways as shown by these studies.
Steidl et. Yeomans: http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/328/1/263.full.pdf+html
Hnasko et al: https://courses.washington.edu/psy222/extracredit/extracredit/Morphine%20reward%20in%20dopamine-deficient%20mice.pdf
Nader et van der Kooy: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/17/1/383.full.pdf+html
There are numerous other studies that look at the mechanism of the opiate-induced activation of the dopamine system. The study by Hnasko et. al. looks at the bigger picture and looks at morphine reward in dopamine-deficient mice. What if someone took away all the dopamine in a mice brain. How would the mice react compared to normal mice and would morphine have an effect on it. They found that these dopamine-deficient mice were severely hypoactive, hypophagic, and required daily administration of L-dopa to prevent starvation. This shows us exactly how important dopamine is to our daily behavior. Without it, the simplest pleasures and even essentials of life don't seem important. After this administration of L-dopa, these mice were administered morphine and the researchers looked at a number of things. They first looked at morphine-induced locomotion via the open field paradigm (total locomotion in a big box is recorded) and found that these dopamine-deficient mice were very lethargic and showed almost no change in locomotion when compared to basal activity. Next, they looked at pain sensitivity via the tail flick test (light beam focused on mice tail and reaction time measured) and found that the dopamine-deficient mice flicked their tails a lot faster than the normal mice. This led them to believe that dopamine may play a role in suppressing pain. Finally, they looked at reward-seeking behavior via the conditioned place preference test (mice exposed to two rooms and given morphine in one and saline in other; then tested to see which they prefer). They found that these dopamine-deficient mice were able to develop a preference for the morphine-condition room, indicating that dopamine isn't essential for reward-seeking behavior in mice. There has to be a new pathway and the cholinergic pathway that Dr. Steidl found may play a part in it.
Other research have shown that there is a difference in how morphine's rewarding effects activate the dopamine system that depends on whether the mice are morphine-deprived (drug withdrawal) and drug naive. This study by Nader and van der Kooy looked mice who had been grown a dependence on morphine and were experience withdrawal and mice who had never been exposed to morphine. By giving these mice either a dopamine antagonist or lesions on the PPTg, these researchers found that in deprived mice, morphine's rewarding effect is dopamine-mediated (only deprived mice failed to develop conditioned place preference for morphine environment when given dopamine antagonists) while in naive mice, morphine's rewarding effect is PPTg-mediated (only naive mice failed to develop conditioned place preference for morphine environment when given PPTg lesions). This further provides evidence of a cholinergic pathway originating in the PPTg that is involved in morphine's rewarding that Dr. Steidl proposes.
In conclusion, this is just a simple preview of the research involved with how researchers think morphine, and similar opiates, affect the mice brain. Due to the fact that Dr. Steidl research is fairly new and still has found something so novel, it is necessary to look at this further. By blocking these pathways, it may be possible to help drug addicts recovering from opiates, since they are highly addicting. However, this would be futile if we weren't aware of all the pathways that morphine acts through. If we try to block only the ones we know, we will be wasting time and money because the morphine will still have its affect through different pathways as shown by these studies.
Steidl et. Yeomans: http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/328/1/263.full.pdf+html
Hnasko et al: https://courses.washington.edu/psy222/extracredit/extracredit/Morphine%20reward%20in%20dopamine-deficient%20mice.pdf
Nader et van der Kooy: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/17/1/383.full.pdf+html
Alzheimer’s Disease and Neurogenesis
ReplyDeleteBy: Leah Miller
On November 6, 2012, Orly Lazarov, PhD, came to our school (Loyola University of Chicago) to give a speech concerning neurogenesis, and the potential that it had for treating mental health diseases. To give some background information, News Medical describes neurogenesis as, “the process by which neurons are generated. Most active during pre-natal development, neurogenesis is responsible for populating the growing brain”. In his speech, Lazarov mentioned that in Alzheimer’s disease, aging is the greatest risk factor for future harm. He went on to state that neurogenesis is associated with this aging process, and may aid in diminishing the effects of the disease.
My interest was to see if there was any other research that supported the conclusions reached by Lazarov. Lazarov also mentioned that there is a dramatic decline in neurogenesis for Alzheimer’s disease, and that this decline causes a loss of placidity of various areas of the brain, leading to decreased memory abilities (as is seen with many Alzheimer’s Disease patients). A second article entitled Increased hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer's disease, supports the findings of Lazarov and his colleagues. In this article the potentials of neurogenesis in treating Alzheimer’s disease is addressed. The abstract of this paper states, “Neurogenesis, which persists in the adult mammalian brain, may provide a basis for neuronal replacement therapy in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD). This group of researchers “investigated the expression of immature neuronal marker proteins that signal the birth of new neurons in the hippocampus of AD patients”. The results found by this group were astounding. It was determined that, compared to controlled experiments, many of the Alzheimer’s disease brains were tagged by the protein markers previously mentioned. Due to these findings the researches believed that, “neurogenesis is increased in AD hippocampus, where it may give rise to cells that replace neurons lost in the disease, and that stimulating hippocampal neurogenesis might provide a new treatment strategy”.
To me the results of this study were incredible. This research makes me believe that we are truly closer to finding a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. This group of scientists was able to tag parts of an Alzheimer’s disease for proteins that are unique to Alzheimer’s disease patients. I feel that this is one of the most significant steps that could have been made towards curing the disease.
................(continued)
....
ReplyDeleteHowever, concerning the speech from Lazarov, he also mentioned that neurogenesis could be extremely beneficial because it may help to interfere with the memory process. If neuro-stem cells were used, they could potentially replicate themselves in order to replace the damaged cells in Alzheimer’s disease patients. These neuro-stem cells have the ability to self renew, differentiate themselves, communicate with mature (already existing) neurons. One major difference between these neuro-stem cells and the mature cells is that these neuro-stem cells do produce their own action potentials. I am not sure as to whether or not that discrepancy would cause detrimental effects, but it is something to keep under consideration. However these neuro-stem cells do have the potential to extend the placidity of different areas of the brain.
Lastly, an article entitled, Impaired neurogenesis is an early event in the etiology of familial Alzheimer's disease in transgenic mice, also comments on the issue of neurogenesis and it’s potential uses in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. In this paper scientists, “report that transgenic mice harboring familial Alzheimer's disease…exhibit severe impairments in neurogenesis that are evident as early as 2 months of age”. This group of researchers used mice in order to determine the effects that Alzheimer’s disease has pathogenically, and came to similar conclusions concerning the relevance of Alzheimer’s disease and neurogenesis.
In conclusion, the Alzheimer’s Disease Association states that 5.4 million people are living with Alzheimer’s disease. Every step that we take towards curing this disease brings these 5.4 million people closer to living normal unhindered lives.
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Neurogenesis-What-is-Neurogenesis.aspx
http://www.pnas.org/content/101/1/343.short
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.22387/full
http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_facts_and_figures.asp