The Effects of Media Violence
Katie Murphy
Media
violence’s effect on our behavior is a growing topic of interest especially when
we observe its influence on the expanding minds of children. Laura Stockdale
from the Department of Psychology at Loyola University Chicago spoke to
Neuroscience Society about media violence and the consequences its high
exposure rates. At first I was somewhat skeptical of the accusations on media
violence and its potential effects on our behavior. I thought to myself, its
just meaningless entertainment, it doesn’t change who I am. After her
presentation, I was convinced, not that media violence makes people violent,
but that media definitely influences thinking and possibly behavior whether we
realize it or not. Often, media violence occurs between a hero and villain.
These violent behaviors performed by the hero are justified and seen as
rewarding and result in few to no consequences. Children see and idolize these
hero’s as they enter into countless battles strapped with machine guns and
swords to kill the enemy. The result is glory. Children often have a hard time
seeing where the line is drawn between imagination and reality. When a child is
playing with their toy guns and swords at home, whether they use them in a
purely innocent act or not, this still shows a sense of desensitization to
weapons and their use. Stockdale says that there’s a growing concern of medias effects
on physical aggression, specifically the intent to harm another person and it
is seen in both genders through different types of aggressive behavior. Stockdale
states that all media seems to have an interaction with behavior. This makes
sense when you think about the music or movies you might choose based on your
mood or how it makes you feel.
Violence
in the media cant force people to act violently, however, it has been shown to
increase desensitization to violent and aggressive behavior therefore,
impairing ones judgment. Longitudinal, cross-sectional and experimental studies
have examined and confirmed this relationship between media violence and its
aggressive consequences seen in youth.
Violence
isn’t anything new so why is violence in media such a big deal?
In
America, 99% of homes have at least one TV and people have shown to use media
for as many hours a week as a full time job (Beresin, 2014). Laura Stockdale’s
study shows that the average amount of time Americans spend using media is
around 11 hours a day (and more on the weekend). About 4.5 hours a day was
found to be spent watching TV, 2.5 hours listening to music and 1 hour playing
video games. With this much contact with potentially violent and aggressive
media, it’s not wonder why an aggressive mood and behavior might be induced.
Dr. Eugene Beresin found that today’s youth watch about 28 hours of TV a week
and witness 200, 000 plus acts of violence and 16,000 plus murders before even
reaching that age of 18. Even children’s programs have about 20 acts of
violence per hour (Beresin, 2014).
For
those who look at media as JUST entertainment the way I did, there are studies
out there, which actually show differences in brain activity when exposed to
violent media. In a study at Indiana University School of Medicine, MRI brain
scans were performed on young men before and after ONLY one week of playing
violent video games. There were significant changes in activation in the
prefrontal area of the brain as well as the amygdala. The prefrontal activation
declined, which deals with decision-making and self-control. On the other hand
the amygdala activation showed increased activation, which is involved in
emotions and can trigger aggression and impulsive behavior (Archer, 2013). This
still doesn’t prove a causal relationship between media and violence but this
could be a new way to understand the possible triggers and events that are
going on during exposure to violent media. Other studies have shown that
violent movies can increase hostile behavior and have also shown that this
aggressive behavior is retained for some while. Further, a study looked at
worldviews of children’s who watch violent films verses those who don’t. Those
who watched violent films were much more likely to associate negative
attributes to their views on the world and believe it to be more of an
aggressive place than children who don’t watch violent films (Archer, 2013).
Although
there’s a lack in the literature on causal evidence of violent media producing
violent or aggressive acts, there’s also no evidence against it. Media is
consumed with violence but that doesn’t mean that everyone is tainted and bound
to behave violently. It does introduce the idea that media should be monitored
and regulated especially amongst children (Pozios, 2013).
The role that media plays and its potential to advocate violent or aggressive
behavior needs to be further examined. I don’t personally believe that media
can turn someone into a serial killer but as Stockdale along with others
suggest, it can promote relational aggression and desensitization to violent
acts as well as desensitization of perception of others pain amongst youth. It
creates a more fearful world to children and could lead to children acting more
aggressively or harmful towards others (Violence in the Media).
Work cited
Archer,
Dale. "Violence, The Media And Your Brain." Psychology Today.,
2013.
Beresin,
Eugene. "The Impact of Media Violence on Children and Adolescents:
Opportunities
for Clinical Interventions." American Academy of Children and
Adolescent
Psychiatry., 2014.
"Violence
in the Media — Psychologists Study TV and Video Game Violence for
Potential
Harmful Effects." American Psychological Association., 2013.
Pozios,
Vasilis K., Praveen R. Kambam, and Eric H. Bender. "Does Media Violence
Lead
to the Real Thing?" The New York Times, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment