Anything You can
Do, I can…well I can’t really do.
What are you talking about?
The debate about gender roles is certainty not a new one. For years
society has established its division of what is acceptable for a male and what
is acceptable for a female. Recently however, there has been a stir in the
divide as society seeks to close the gender gap. In an article by Dockterman
posted in Time entitled “The
War on Pink: GoldieBlox Toys Ignite Debate Over What’s Good For Girls” we see
the works of many corporations fighting to get girls interested in STEM careers
in an attempt to diversify the field, which for the most part, has been heavily
dominated by males.
Their methodology as it seem is to diversify the toys that girls use in
an attempt to instill some sort of interest in STEM. Dockterman continues her
article discussing a new toy company, GoldieBlox that aims to encouraging girls
to pursue engineering careers. While GoldieBlox is clearly aimed at girls some
believe that gender neutral toys are the way to go because they don’t leave
anyone left out and can appeal to both sexes. However critics as noted by
Dockterman argue that “Despite the idealistic aspirations of a
gender-neutral world of toys, girls and boys do play differently; so in order
to engage girls in science, toy makers need to take a different approach than
they traditionally have with boys”(2013).
Despite the challenges that women have faced in the STEM
field, women themselves have made significant progress in the workplace.
Dockterman comments that “all those cute little vacuum cleaners and mini baby
bottles haven’t discouraged girls from going to college or excelling in
academic fields other than science.”(2013) In fact women make up a majority of
undergrads, on the contrary society as a whole has made exploring identity far
easier for girls than it is for boys.
How So?...(I’ll get there stay with me)
Well, while it is readily accepted that boys are rambunctious and do in fact express a higher activity level, society as a whole treats their exploration of identity differently. Often confining their options to a set standard that discourages any deviation from what is expected. Eliot states that “compared to men, women have a wider range of options as adults-from stay-at—home to businesswoman, doctor, soldier…girls see these roles in real life…and are taught that they can do anything boys can do” (location 1969). Boys however, do not get the same type of nurturing. To take a line from a popular meme circulating the
That’s Horrible!
Well yeah I know that’s why I’m writing about it in the
first place. This fear of having their children ostracized by society has led
many of these parents to force their children into a category “fear[ing] the
wrong parenting decision could devastate their child’s social or emotional
well-being.”(Padawer 2012) Society as a whole has created stigmas around men
in “traditionally female occupations” and boys are “rarely told that they can
do anything girls can do” (location 1985). Why is this? Can’t we bury the
hatchet and accept that children are children and how they turn out is
independent of what they choose to play with. To quote a child named Riley who
posted a video that went viral in 2011 “why all the little girls have to buy
princesses and boys have to buy superheroes when both girls and boys should be
able to like superheroes and princesses alike.”(Padawer 2012). I
will leave you with that thought.
Work
Cited
Dockterman,
Eliana. "The War on Pink: GoldieBlox Toys Ignite Debate Over What’s Good
For Girls | TIME.com." Time. Time, 27 Nov. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2014.
Elliot, Lise. “Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow
Into Troublesome Gaps and What We Can Do About It.” New York: Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt Publishing Company. 2009. Print
Padawer, Ruth.
"What’s So Bad About a Boy Who Wants to Wear a Dress?" The New
York Times. The New York Times, 11 Aug. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment