"Male brain" vs. "female brain"?
It is widely accepted that behavioral
differences between males and females are associated with structural
differences in the brain. Gender
stereotypes are so obvious in society and many are quick to develop
pseudoscientific explanations, that women are more emotional because their
limbic systems are larger, for example. Some go as far as to distinguish between “female”
and “male” brains. But why are we
comparing the brain to a reproductive organ when it is so much more than
that? Daphna Joel, head of the
psychology program at Tel Aviv University’s School of Psychological Sciences and
researcher at the Sagol School of Neuroscience at Tel Aviv University, asks
this question everyday as she has devoted her research to exploring the
physiological differences between the male and female brains – which, there
turns out, aren’t many of.
Joel, who began researching neural
differences between genders several years ago, has made it her goal to better
educate people on how little the brain varies between males and females. After extensive meta-analysis, she has exposed
the ambiguity and scandal in already published studies on how brains are wired
differently. She believes that these
studies gain more attention because they appeal to the public more than those
that provide more “boring” explanations.
In fact, she has had trouble even publishing articles about her
suggested intersex brain.
“The editors wrote to me, saying that the subject of the
article was not interesting to the public.
Just like that,” said Joel.
She
believes that developmental differences between genders come from the way
children are raised, not the way their brains are formed. She asserts that male stereotypes such as
aggressiveness are reinforced in young boys but discouraged in young
girls. Conversely, boys are discouraged
from and showing emotion while similar behavior is excused in girls.
This is also the basis of the argument made by Lise Eliot in her book “Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps – And What We Can Do About It”. Eliot, a neuroscientist at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, argues that children are trained from birth to adhere to their gender stereotypes, resulting in the differences in personality and behavior that we associate to either males or females. She believes that parents react differently to young boys than they would young girls, changing their environment in ways that have already been proven in neuroscience to affect the way genes are expressed which over time, could lead to significant cerebral differences. But, she emphasizes that this refers to adult brains and that these differences are not seen from birth. She suggests taking a more gender-neutral approach to parenting, hoping that this can close the gap between what is accepted and what is considered inappropriate within specific genders. With the field of neuroscience advancing so quickly, it is important to distinguish between legitimate scientific discoveries and public interest pseudoscience. Hopefully, more like Joel and Eliot also realize this problem and can help better educate society on these important social issues.
This is also the basis of the argument made by Lise Eliot in her book “Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps – And What We Can Do About It”. Eliot, a neuroscientist at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, argues that children are trained from birth to adhere to their gender stereotypes, resulting in the differences in personality and behavior that we associate to either males or females. She believes that parents react differently to young boys than they would young girls, changing their environment in ways that have already been proven in neuroscience to affect the way genes are expressed which over time, could lead to significant cerebral differences. But, she emphasizes that this refers to adult brains and that these differences are not seen from birth. She suggests taking a more gender-neutral approach to parenting, hoping that this can close the gap between what is accepted and what is considered inappropriate within specific genders. With the field of neuroscience advancing so quickly, it is important to distinguish between legitimate scientific discoveries and public interest pseudoscience. Hopefully, more like Joel and Eliot also realize this problem and can help better educate society on these important social issues.
Works Cited:
Eliot, Lise. Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps--and What We Can Do About It. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009. Print.
Weissberg, Hila. "Fifty Shades of Grey Matter: Male vs. Female Brains." Haaretz.com. N.p., 27 Feb. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment