As an undergraduate student at Loyola, it is hard to imagine
that women are not involved in science. There sheer number of female students
in science classes largely overwhelms the small minority of men. However,
Loyola University Chicago is a rare and special case. Women in science, even in
2014, are still lagging behind men. The question becomes why are there so few
females in the science field.
Eileen
Pollack explains in her article, “Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?”
that there is a bias against women in the science field. A recent study
performed at Yale showed that the discrimination. Handelsman and Corrine
Moss-Racusin sent out 127 identical resumes for a lab manager job, with one
exception. Half the resumes were from a student named “John”, while the other
half were from a student named “Jennifer.” Then, each faculty member was asked
to rate the applicant “in terms of competence, hireability, likeability, and
the extent to which the professor might be wiling to mentor the student.” They
were also asked what they would pay the student if they received the position.
The results were astounding. John was rated higher in all of the categories
except for likability. Also, John would have made approximately $4,000 more
than Jennifer if he was hired.
The
staggering results show us that there is a “subconscious institutional bias.”
Many professors just value a male over a female and think he deserves a higher
salary. However, the startling part came when the researchers realized that
female professors were just as likely to hire a male than a female. The
researchers at Yale believed that these results reflected this bias that is
just subconscious and most people do not think about it.
Lise
Eliot in her book, Pink Brain, Blue
Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps—and What We Can Do
About It, also explains this strange phenomenon. Males are regarded more
highly in terms of education than women in the media. For example, a study done
by Camilla Benbow and Julian Stanley in found that more males scored higher
than females on the math SAT. Newsweek magazine took the study and declared
that men are naturally better at math than women because of a “math gene.”
These statements by the media produce a culture in which females are seen as
the lesser gender when it comes to math and science. Therefore, it is hardly
surprising that the Yale study, as mentioned above, dealt with professors
subconsciously choosing a male applicant over a female applicant.
Overall,
there needs to be a drastic upheaval of cultural stigmas regarding women in
math. They are just as capable and educated as a male would be. Just ask one of
the numerous hard-working female science majors at Loyola University Chicago.
Works Cited
Eliot, Lise. Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps--and What We Can Do about It. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009. Print.
Pollack, Eileen. "Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?" The New York Times 6 Oct. 2013: n. pag. The New York Times. 3 Oct. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment